News & Insights

CMC (Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls) is no longer an afterthought for cell therapy developers; it’s the key to clinical and commercial success. Over the past two years, a significant percentage of FDA Complete Response Letters (CRLs) have been attributed to insufficient CMC packages, rather than issues related to therapeutic product safety or efficacy.
However, building a solid plan early in the development cycle, including a dynamic CMC roadmap, qualified assays, and proactive change control, cuts risk and keeps approvals on track. At Kincell Bio, we treat CMC as a strategic foundation for market success, not a checklist exercise, so breakthrough therapies reach patients faster. Below, we unpack the twelve CMC pain points most likely to derail a cell therapy development program, along with strategies that deliver success.
12 Common Cell Therapy CMC Stumbling Blocks
1) Product characterization & potency
Defining critical quality attributes (CQAs) such as phenotype, function, purity, and viability for living products and linking them to clinical relevance is challenging because cell populations are heterogeneous and dynamic. Robust, fit-for-purpose potency assessment, which is often multi-attribute and mechanism-reflective, remains a top CMC deficiency.
2) Analytical method development & validation
Analytical assays are the backbone of product characterization, release criteria, and stability protocols. Weaknesses in assay qualification, such as a lack of specificity, concerns about reproducibility, or poorly defined acceptance criteria, are a frequent source of regulatory questions and clinical delays.
3) Comparability after changes
Process, scale, raw material, and manufacturing site changes are common as a cell therapy advances from early-phase development to the market. With a risk-based, data-rich retain and comparability plan, a CMC package must demonstrate that there has been no adverse impact on safety, quality, and potency as the therapeutic’s production scales or production sites change.
4) Manufacturing consistency & process validation
Autologous programs face lot-to-lot variability due to factors such as patient health, variability in prior lines of therapy and apheresis collection variability. Allogeneic programs, on the other hand, tend to face scaling-related challenges. While the process differences of autologous and allogeneic cell therapies are known, innovators often lack a clear control strategy, in-process controls, acceptance criteria, and a robust process validation approach.
5) Raw materials, ancillary supplies & supply chain
Animal-derived reagents, cytokines, enzymes, beads, and vectors sometimes lack full GMP qualification. Traceability, chain of identity (COI), chain of custody (COC), vendor oversight, and change notification systems are recurring gaps, especially across multi-site, global supply chains.
6) Sterility assurance & contamination control
While closed-cell processing systems significantly help ensure sterility, many steps remain open and require numerous manual interventions. Regulators scrutinize aseptic processing, environmental monitoring data, sterility strategies, mycoplasma testing, the control of adventitious agents, and particulates.
7) Vector & genome editing controls
For gene-modified cells, common review challenges include end-to-end controls for vector or editing reagent (e.g., mRNA/LNP) quality, residuals, replication-competent virus testing, insertional mutagenesis risk, vector copy number, on- and off-target editing, and transgene expression kinetics.
8) Cryopreservation, thaw, and dose integrity
Real-world product quality at thaw can significantly diverge from release testing if one cell therapy lot contains a substantially higher proportion of pre-apoptotic cells than another. This variable considerably impacts dose escalation and overall product performance.
9) Stability programs
Formulated cell therapies often have a short shelf life (or biological challenges to maintaining integrity or tertiary structure upon cryopreservation) and are sensitive to changes in temperature, freezing/thawing, and other environmental factors, making long-term stability studies challenging and demanding. Further challenges include collecting real-time stability data, such as in-process holds and post-thaw conditions; yet, these understandings are essential for determining shelf life, hold-time stability at the clinical administration site, labeling, and logistics management.
10) Facility readiness & GMP infrastructure
FDA scrutinizes facility operations, including quality system maturity, data integrity, deviation/CAPA, training, computer systems, quality risk management, and pre-approval inspection readiness. Facilities and operations must align with the needs of the cell therapy produced.
11) Donor eligibility & starting-material control
For autologous/allogeneic sources, alignment on donor screening, testing, traceability, and transport conditions remains a frequent gap. Common pitfalls include incomplete eligibility, documentation errors, identity/traceability breaks, contamination, collection variability, transport excursions, low-quality starting cells, inadequate quarantine, and data-integrity gaps.
12) Regulatory alignment & documentation
Incomplete or fragmented CMC narratives, missing risk assessments, and weak justification of specifications and/or acceptance criteria slow reviews. Early, phase-appropriate alignment with guidance is key, and pre-IND and pre-BLA meetings with the FDA are ideal opportunities to ensure alignment with regulatory expectations.
How Kincell Helps to Navigate Cell Therapy CMC Complexity
When intentional CMC planning and execution begin in early development phases, teams can anticipate potential regulatory snags, manufacturing scalability issues, and costly rework before these risks become existential threats. Kincell Bio supports our clients in developing a living CMC roadmap that successfully guides the program throughout the development lifecycle, including identifying critical quality attributes early, designing scalable processes, and implementing rigorous, phase-appropriate analytical methods. The living roadmap is crucial as global regulators expect to see not only a snapshot of current controls but a clear path showing how a process will mature and scale throughout development and commercialization.
Additionally, our analytics and quality control experts guide clients through the design, qualification, and phase-appropriate validation of potency, safety, identity, purity, and other critical assays. We build these tools to provide early-phase insight with flexibility for refinements as the program matures. This balance of scientific rigor with practical adaptability ensures teams don’t become paralyzed by overengineering in early phases, but can efficiently add robustness as the program advances.
Additionally, we collaborate with our innovator clients to craft proactive change control strategies that identify likely process adjustments, plan comparability studies, and implement tools for data tracking from the outset. This holistic framework future-proofs regulatory submissions, minimizes costly surprises, and helps preserve both speed and quality if changes become necessary. Kincell’s integrated approach means clients have a methodology for risk assessment, documentation, and communication, whether addressing a routine optimization or a major process pivot.
Kincell Turns CMC Hurdles into Filing Success
Success in cell therapy hinges on CMC expertise, program design, and execution. Programs that integrate data-driven roadmaps, qualified assays, and proactive change control into every phase earn regulators’ confidence and generally expedite the submission review process.
Kincell Bio transforms the twelve pain points above into opportunities to strengthen programs by integrating process science, quality systems, and regulatory strategy from the start. Our teams align on CQAs early on, build scalable methods, and maintain inspection readiness as your therapy matures. Don’t put your program in a defensive position after experiencing a compliance or regulatory setback; turn robust CMC strategies into a competitive edge. Let’s discuss how Kincell Bio can help.